Your judgement, properly represented.
We are speaking with prospective contributors for the first research pilots. Start with a focused contribution on a question where your experience matters.
A focused interview. A clear agreement.
Before work begins, we agree the question, time commitment, fee, permissions and review process. Existing work is considered only where the relevant rights can be established.
Contribute judgement
Explain what matters, where evidence is weak and what would change your view. The commitment is scoped to the assignment, with no assumed annual schedule.
Review your claims
An analyst structures the contribution. You review and correct the claims attributed to you before they are approved for use.
Agree how it is used
Your agreement sets the permitted uses, attribution, payment and correction process. Public availability alone does not establish permission to reproduce your work.
A model designed to reward contribution.
Martlet intends to share revenue from reusable research with contributing experts. The royalty calculation engine exists, while commercial terms are still being finalised.
We will agree any royalty entitlement, eligible usage, reporting and payment schedule in writing. The public examples do not show live earnings. Contributor dashboards and automated payouts remain development work.
Payment does not determine editorial agreement. Competing views remain visible and relevant interests are disclosed alongside the work.
Tell us where you have a view.
Share your field, relevant experience and the decisions you think need better evidence. We will discuss the fit with a first pilot and the terms before asking you to contribute.